Students will write a 5- to 7-page (excluding the title page and reference already added- so 9 pages total) discussing a case vignette provided by the instructor and integrating relevant information from a journal article(s) assigned by the instructor. This paper will be written in stages.
1. Students will independently read and analyze an assigned journal article and submit a journal assignment in response to that analysis
2. Students will write and submit a thesis statement based on that analysis
3. Student will develop and submit an outline of the paper
4. Students will write their paper and bring Draft One for an in class peer review
5. Students will revise their paper and submit Draft Two
6. Students will meet individually with the instructor to review Draft Two
7. Students will submit their final paper
In Reamer’s article on boundary issues in social work, he identifies 5 different classes of boundary issues, distinguishing problematic boundaries from those that are not, and offers guidelines for practitioners to manage boundary issues that they encounter during their practice.
Apply key concepts from Reamer’s article and the NASW Code of Ethics to three examples of boundary issues/violations identified in the case scenario provided by the professor.
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Both of your draft papers as well as your final paper must conform to APA format. You will need a title page with a running head, an abstract, in-text citations, and a reference page. Without ALL of these elements, your paper will be returned to you without feedback to guide improvements, and will be considered a late submission when completed and resubmitted.
Your paper must adhere, in APA format, to the following format:
1. Title Page
2. Body of the Paper
A. Introduction
1. Purpose of the paper
2. Importance of the topic
3. Organizational statement
4. Clearly defined thesis statement
NOTES: purpose of the paper should include the importance meaning why is it important to study about boundaries and dual relationships. Organizational statement should include how your paper is organized and what you did to write paper example: you looked at a case study of Angel Z, you looked at the code of ethics, and you looked at the Reamer Article (expand on that concept) tell reader how you organize your paper.
B. Key Terms
Notes: terms should be in paragraph format, use term of Reamer, cite appropriately, if using direct quote word for word make sure you use quotation marks and page number. Identify and define the things Reamer talk about that are important (not in bullet) example: “boundary crossing are define by Reamer /1993 as………(page#) he further differentiate boundaries violation as ……….make sure you cite what you doing word for word must have quotation mark and page number. If paraphrase or summarizing no page# needed or quote BUT MUST BE CITED.
C. Summary of the case study (summary of the background of the case and not a summary of the three ethical issues)
D. Discussion of ethical issues
Notes:summary of case study must write a brief summary of what the case is about, do not specify what worker did or angel did. Must describe who angel is, who the worker is, why angel was refer to the worker and what happened. ONLY 1 PARAGRAPH
Key Point One (each key points 4 paragraph) notes: key point 1 should explain situation from Angel Z case study one or two sentences( not too long)
Paragraph 1
· Example from case study
· Identify if the social worker’s actions in this example were ethical or unethical and justify your choice
Paragraph 2 notes( use Reamer terminology of what the difference is and explain why
· Which of Reamer’s central themes (p. 124 in article) does this example illustrate
· Which of Reamer’s central subthemes (p. 124 in article) does this example illustrate
· Identify if this is a boundary crossing or boundary violation and justify your choice
Paragraph 3 notes relate to the NASW code of ethics, what part of the code relates to what you wrote about in paragraph 1 and why is that the most relevant part of the code.
· What part(s) of the NASW Code of Ethics would this issue relate to (be specific and cite the Standard section(s) of the Code
· Why is this the most relevant part(s) of the Code
Paragraph 4
· Discussion integrating the Reamer article and the NASW Code of Ethics
· What could the social worker have done differently
Notes: use the same paragraph format for each of the 3 scenarios. Last page should be reference page which already included.
Key Point Two
Paragraph 1
· Example from case study
· Identify if the social worker’s actions in this example were ethical or unethical and justify your choice
Paragraph 2
· Which of Reamer’s central themes (p. 124 in article) does this example illustrate
· Which of Reamer’s central subthemes (p. 124 in article) does this example illustrate
· Identify if this is a boundary crossing or boundary violation and justify your choice
Paragraph 3
· What part(s) of the NASW Code of Ethics would this issue relate to (be specific and cite the Standard section(s) of the Code
· Why is this the most relevant part(s) of the Code
Paragraph 4
· Discussion integrating the Reamer article and the NASW Code of Ethics
· What could the social worker have done differently
Key Point Three
Paragraph 1
· Example from case study
· Identify if the social worker’s actions in this example were ethical or unethical and justify your choice
Paragraph 2
· Which of Reamer’s central themes (p. 124 in article) does this example illustrate
· Which of Reamer’s central subthemes (p. 124 in article) does this example illustrate
· Identify if this is a boundary crossing or boundary violation and justify your choice
Paragraph 3
· What part(s) of the NASW Code of Ethics would this issue relate to (be specific and cite the Standard section(s) of the Code
· Why is this the most relevant part(s) of the Code
Paragraph 4
· Discussion integrating the Reamer article and the NASW Code of Ethics
· What could the social worker have done differently
4. Conclusion
1. Thesis and key points revisited
2. Conclusion or findings
3. Importance of your findings
4. Impact of ethical breaches on clients and on your future career
Reference Page
Since all our papers are written from scratch, the papers we submit are plagiarism free and we strictly adhere to lecturer’s instructions. Our writers are highly qualified from all over the world and include graduates and professors from most of the largest and known universities in the world. Once you have assigned us your assignment, we select the most qualified and reliable writer to handle your assignment.
Unlike other writing companies, we encourage clients to draw back their money at any stage of the writing process if they experience any uncertainties with the quality of generated content. However, you will hardly have to make this decision because of our business approach that suits your needs.
We have an advanced plagiarism-detection system that flags any work that fails to meet the required academic expectations. Our company thrives in honesty, and as such, you will be guaranteed to achieve a paper that meets your expectations.
At homeworkpaper.org we have online agents that you can chat with to have your assignment taken care of with the little remaining time. Also, we have professional academic writers who will work on your assignment providing you with a high-quality paper at the same time. We can take care of your urgent assignments in less than 5 hours.
We uphold confidentiality and privacy through our interactions with clients, an aspect that has enhanced our relationship with prospective customers seeking for assignment help. We do not disclose your information with third-parties; neither do we share your work with any other person apart from you.
We do not resell previously-done tasks delivered to other clients. When we deliver orders to our clients, we safeguard their privacy and confidentiality by ensuring the third party does not access the work. By writing the papers from scratch, we have managed to maintain a certain level of originality, which defines our business model. Our qualified editors proofread all submitted work to eliminate mistakes that can interfere with the credibility of the assignment.